The Renaissance Roots of the 'History of Concepts'
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v19.2284Palabras clave:
Gadamer, Reinhart Koselleck, diachronicResumen
With the subsidence of the wave of extreme tendency to 'discontinuity' and finding 'rupture' in different fields of human knowledge, we need to rethink the historical origins of many theoretical approaches. Neglecting the historical currents that have been effective in constructing theories leads to failure in understanding some of their significant features and implications. This article does not seek to anachronistically find Koselleck's 'history of concepts' in the Renaissance. Rather, it seeks the roots and continuities that have distinguished it from structuralist and pure linguistically oriented methodologies that mostly emerged after the contemporary linguistic turn. Thus, this question will be first answered as to why less attention has been paid to the historical roots of the 'history of concepts', despite its well-known relation to Gadamerian hermeneutics and Hegelian thinking. Then, the confluence of the two intellectual currents that contributed to constructing the 'history of concepts' will be addressed.
Descargas
Citas
BECK-LASSEN, Frank. Metaphorically Speaking: Begriffsgeschichte and Hans Blumenberg's Metaphorologie. In: POZZO, Riccardo; SGARBI, Marco (Hg.). Eine Typologie der Formen der Begriffsgeschichte. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2010. p. 53-70.
BLUM, Paul Richard. Philosophy of Religion in the Renaissance. Burlington: Ashgate, 2010.
BOWERSOCK, G. W. Introduction. In: VALLA, Lorenzo. On the Donation of Constantine. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2007, p. VI-XV.
BRUCKER, Gene. The Italian Renaissance. In: RUGGIERO, Guido (ed.). A Companion to the Worlds of Renaissance. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007. p. 23-38.
BUBNER, Rüdiger. Looking Back on Gadamer’s Hermeneutics. In: ZABALA, Santiago (ed.). Weakening Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Gianni Vattimo. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2007. p. 217-230.
BUTLER, Clark; SEILER, Christiane. Hegel: The Letters. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.
CAMPOREALE, Salvatore. Christianity, Latinity, and Culture: Two Studies on Lorenzo Valla. Translated by Patrick Baker. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
CELENZA, Christopher S. The Intellectual World of Italian Renaissance: Language, Philosophy, and the Search for Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
CELENZA, Christopher S. The Italian Renaissance and the Origins of the Modern Humanities: An Intellectual History 1400–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
CELENZA, Christopher S. The lost Italian Renaissance: Humanists, Historians, and Latin’s Legacy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.
COPENHAVER, Brian. Translation, Terminology and Style in Philosophical Discourse. In: SKINNER, Quentin; KESSLER, Eckhard (eds.). The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 77-110.
CUSANO, Niccolò. Opere Filosofiche, Teologiche e Matematiche. a cura di Enrico Peroli. Milano; Bompiani, 2017.
DE GRAZIA, Margreta. Anachronism. In: CUMMINGS, Brian; SIMPSON, James (eds.). Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 13-32.
DEN BOER, Pim. The Historiography of German Begriffigeschichte and the Dutch Project of Conceptual History. In: HAMPSHER-MONK, Iain; TILMANS, Karin; VAN VREE, Frank (eds.). History of Concepts: Comparative Perspectives. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998. p. 13-22.
DESMOND, Will D. Hegel’s Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
DILTHEY, Wilhelm. Hermeneutics and the Study of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
DUPRÉ, Louis; HUDSON, Nancy. Nicholas of Cusa. In: GARCIA, Jorge; NOONE, Timothy (eds.). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Malden: Blackwell, 2002. p. 466-474.
DUTT, Carsten. Historische Semantik als Begriffsgeschichte: Theoretische Grundlagen und paradigmatische Anwendungsfelder. In: RIECKE, Jörg (Hg.). Historische Semantik: Jahrbuch für germanistische Sprachgeschichte, Band 2. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011, p. 37-50.
FEHÉR, István. Hermeneutik und Philologie: Verständnis der Sachen, Verständnis des Textes. In: Berliner Beiträge zur Hungarologie. Schriftenreihe des Seminars für Hungarologie an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 11. Berlin/Budapest: Humboldt-Universität,1999. p. 11-25.
FlASCH, Kurt. Die Metaphysik des Einen bei Nikolaus von Kues: Problemgeschichtliche Stellung und systematische Bedeutung. Leiden: Brill, 1973.
FUBINI, Riccardo. Humanism and Secularisation: From Petrarch to Valla. Translated by Martha King. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.
GABRIEL, Gottfried. Die Bedeutung von Begriffsgeschichte und Metaphorologie für eine systematische Philosophie. In: STROSETZKI, Christoph (Hg.). Literaturwissenschaft als Begriffsgeschichte. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Sonderheft 8. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2010. p. 17-28.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Nicolaus Cusanus und die Gegenwart. In: Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 4: Neuere Philosophie II. Tübingen: Mohr, 1987. p. 297-305.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Historik und Sprache. In: KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Zeitschichten: Studien zur Historik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000. p. 119-127.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Reflections on My Philosophical Journey. In: HAHN, Lewis E. (ed.). The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Chicago: Open Court, 1997. p. 3-63.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 1. Tübingen: Mohr, 1990.
GERL, Hanna-Barbara. Abstraktion und Gemeinsinn: Zur Frage des Paradigmenwechsels von der Scholastik zum Humanismus in der Argumentationstheorie Lorenzo Vallas. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, Leuven, v. 44, n. 4, p. 677-706, 1982.
GINZBURG, Carlo. History, Rhetoric, and Proof. London: University Press of New England, 1999.
GRAVELLE, Sarah S. A New Theory of Truth. Journal of the History of Ideas, Philadelphia, v. 50, no. 2, p. 333-336, 1989.
GRAVELLE, Sarah S. Lorenzo Valla's Comparison of Latin and Greek and the Humanist Back-Ground. Bibliothèque d'Humanisme et Renaissance, Paris, v. 44, no. 2, p. 269-289, 1982.
GREEN, Jonathon; KAROLIDES, Nicholas. Encyclopedia of Censorship. New York: Facts On File, 2005.
GRENDLER, Paul. Printing and Censorship. In: SCHMITT, Charles; SKINNER, Quentin; KESSLER, Eckhard (eds.). The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 25-53.
GUMBRECHT, Hans Ulrich. The Powers of Philology: Dynamics of Textual Scholarship. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2003.
HAWKES, Terence. Structuralism and Semiotics. London: Routledge, 2003.
HEGEL, G.W.F. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, Werke 7. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.
HEGEL, G.W.F. Lectures on the History of Philosophy: The Lectures of 1825-1826. Translated by R. F. Brown; J. M. Stewart; H. S. Harris. Oakland: University of California Press, 1990.
HEGEL, G.W.F. Phänomenologie des Geistes, Werke 3. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.
HEGEL, G.W.F. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, Werke 12. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994.
HOLBERTON, Paul. Honesta voluptas: The Renaissance Justification for Enjoyment of the Natural World. In: GOODCHILD, Karen; OETTINGER, April; PROSPERETTI, Leopoldine (eds.). Green Worlds in Early Modern Italy: Art and the Verdant Earth. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2019. p. 69-86.
HOY, David Couzens. The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Oakland: University of California Press, 1982.
JAKOBSON, Roman; HALLE, Morris. Fundamentals of Language. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002.
JENSEN, Kristian. The Humanist Reform of Latin and Latin Teaching. In: KRAYE, Jill (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. p. 63-81.
KELLY, Donald. Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: Language, Law, and History in the French Renaissance. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.
KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2006.
KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Einleitung. In: BRUNNER, Otto; CONZE, Werner; KOSELLECK, Reinhart (Hg.). Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Band 1. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1974. p. XIII-XXVII.
KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Kritik und Krise: Eine Studie zur Pathogenese der bürgerlichen Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1976.
KOSELLECK, Reinhart. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2002.
KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995.
KRISTELLER, Paul Oskar. Acht Philosophen der italienischen Renaissance. Weinheim: Acta humaniora, 1986.
KRISTELLER, Paul Oskar. Renaissance Thought: The Classic, Scholastic, and Humanistic Strains. New York: Harper & Row, 1961.
LANDER, Jesse. Historiography. In: CUMMINGS, Brian; SIMPSON, James (eds.). Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 56-74.
LORCH, Maristella. Introduction. In: VALLA, Lorenzo. On Pleasure/De voluptate. Translated by A. K. Hieatt; M. Lorch. New York: Abaris Books, 1977, p. 7-46.
LÖWITH, Karl. Meaning in History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949.
MEHRING, Reinhard, Negativer Kantianismus: Kosellecks sinnkritische "Primärerfahrung". In: HETTLING, Manfred; SCHIEDER, Wolfgang (Hg.). Reinhart Koselleck als Historiker: Zu den Bedingungen möglicher Geschichten. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2021. p. 347-370.
MONFASANI, John. Was Lorenzo Valla an Ordinary Language Philosopher? Journal of the History of Ideas, Philadelphia, v. 50, no. 2, p. 309-323, 1989.
MOSS, Ann. Renaissance Truth and the Latin Language Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
MOSSLEH, Pegah. On Lithoconcepts: A Critical Contribution to the Discussions about the Study of Concepts. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, HELSINKI, v. 26, no. 1, p. 57-78. 2023. DOI: 10.33134/rds.383
MÜLLER, Jan-Werner. On Conceptual History. In: MCMAHON, Darrin; MOYN, Samuel (eds.). Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 74-93.
NAUTA, Lodi. In Defense of Common Sense: Lorenzo Valla's Humanist Critique of Scholastic Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
NAUTA, Lodi. Lorenzo Valla and the Rise of Humanist Dialectic. In: HANKINS, James. The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 193-210.
NICHOLAS OF CUSA. On Not-other/ De Li Non Aliud. In: HOPKINS, Jasper. Nicholas of Cusa on God as Not-other. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979. p. 27-151.
NICHOLAS OF CUSA. Trialogus de possest. In: HOPKINS, Jasper. A Concise Introduction to the Philosophy of Nicholas of Cusa. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1978. p. 63-153.
NICOLAUS DE CUSA. Idiota de mente. In: STEIGER, R. (ed.). Nicolai de Cusa Opera omnia. Vol. V. Hamburg: Meiner, 1983. p. 81–218.
OLIVA, Mirela. The Metaphysics of Language in Cusanus and Gadamer. Anuario Filosófico, Pamplona, v. 49, no.2, p. 401-422, 2016.
OLSEN, Niklas. History in the Plural: An Introduction to the Work of Reinhart Koselleck. London: Berghahn, 2014.
PALONEN, Kari. Politics and Conceptual Histories: Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2014.
PERCIVAL, Keith. Renaissance Grammar. In: RABIL, Albert (ed.). Renaissance Humanism. Vol. 3: Humanism and the Disciplines. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988. p. 67-84.
PIPPIN, Robert. Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
POZZO, Riccardo; SGARBI, Marco (Hg.). Eine Typologie der Formen der Begriffsgeschichte. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2010.
RITTER, Joachim. Zur Neufassung des Eisler. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, Frankfurt am Main, v. 18, n. 4, p. 704‐708, 1964.
ROTHER, Wolfgang. Gustav Teichmüllers Theorie der Begriffsgeschichte. In: STROSETZKI, Christoph (Hg.). Literaturwissenschaft als Begriffsgeschichte. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Sonderheft 8. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2010. p. 29-42.
SCHLÜTER, Gisela. Einleitung. In: EUCKEN, Rudolf. Geschichte der philosophischen Terminologie im Umriss dargestellt. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2023. p. VII-XLI.
SCHMITT, Carl. The Nomos of the Earth: In the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Translated by G. L. Ulmen. New York: Telos Press, 2006.
SCHMITT, Carl. Political Romanticism. Translated by Guy Oakes. New York: Routledge, 2017.
SEEBOHM, T. M. Hermeneutics: Method and Methodology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.
SEIGEL, Jerrold. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Renaissance Humanism: The Union of Eloquence and Wisdom, Petrarch to Valla. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.
STRUEVER, Nancy. The Language of History in the Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.
TEICHMÜLLER, Gustav. Studien zur Geschichte der Begriffe. Berlin: Weidmann, 1874.
TIETZE, Peter. Kosellecks reflektierter Historismus. In: HETTLING, Manfred; SCHIEDER, Wolfgang (Hg.). Reinhart Koselleck als Historiker: Zu den Bedingungen möglicher Geschichten. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2021. p. 302-346.
TURNER, James. Philology: The Forgotten Origins of the Modern Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.
VALLA, Lorenzo. Dialectical Disputations. Edited and Translated by Brian Copenhaver; Lodi Nauta. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.
VALLA, Lorenzo. On the Donation of Constantine. Translated by G. W. Bowersock. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
VALLAE, Laurentii. Latinae linguae elegantia. Parisiis: Ex officina Rob. Stephani typographi Regii, 1541.
VASOLI, Cesare. The Renaissance concept of philosophy. In: SKINNER, Quentin; KESSLER, Eckhard (eds.). The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 57-74.
WIENFORT, Monika. Reinhart Koselleck, Preußen und das Recht. In: HETTLING, Manfred; SCHIEDER, Wolfgang (Hg.). Reinhart Koselleck als Historiker: Zu den Bedingungen möglicher Geschichten. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2021. p. 208-224.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Pegah Mossleh

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores son los poseedores de los derechos de autor de los manuscritos enviados. Se autoriza a la revista História da Historiografia: International Journal for Theory and History of Historiography la realización de la publicación del referido texto. Los datos, conceptos y opiniones presentados en los trabajos, así como la exactitud de las referencias documentales y bibliográficas, son de entera responsabilidad de los autores.

Este trabajo está licenciado con una licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.











