Approaches to the History of Philosophical Concepts
Intersections of the History of Philosophy with Intellectual History and Conceptual History
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v18.2342Palavras-chave:
Filosofia, História intelectual, História dos conceitosResumo
This article addresses historiographical questions about the concepts by which philosophy attempts to provide answers to the problems it poses. It argues for a view of philosophy as a historically dynamic intellectual practice that has no clear and fixed boundaries separating it from other disciplines. It proposes that the history of philosophy should be practiced as a kind of history that lies within, rather than outside, intellectual history. It shows that philosophical concepts are sometimes born and persist within philosophy, sometimes die without passing through philosophy, and sometimes come from or migrate to other disciplines. It also argues that the methodology of conceptual history can be helpful in the study of philosophical concepts. The article concludes that the history of philosophy is relevant in its own right and suggests how the new histories of philosophy written from postcolonial, global, and feminist perspectives are a clear example of this.
Downloads
Referências
AUSTIN, John Langshaw. Ifs and Cans. In: URMSON, J. O.; WARNOCK, J. G. (eds.). Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961, p. 153-80.
BURKE, Martin J. Histories of Concepts and Histories of Ideas. Practices and Prospects. In: POZZO, Ricardo; SGARBI, Marco (eds.). Eine Typologie der Formen der Begriffsgeschichte. Meiner: Hamburg, 2010, p. 149-162.
BRETT, Annabel. What is Intellectual History Now? In: CANNADINE, David (ed.). What is History Now? New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, p. 113-131.
CARROL, John W. Laws of Nature. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2016 Edition. Available on: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/laws-of-nature/. Accesed January, 21 2025.
CATANA, Leo. Philosophical Problems in the History of Philosophy: What Are They? In: LÆRKE, Mogens; SMITH, Justin E. H.; SCHLIESSER, Eric (eds.). Philosophy and its history: Aims and methods in the study of early modern philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 115-133.
CHAUBET, François. Histoire des intellectuels, histoire intellectuelle: Bilan provisoire et perspectives. Vingtième siècle. Revue d’Histoire, n. 101, 2009, p. 179-190.
Available on https://shs.cairn.info/revue-vingtieme-siecle-revue-d-histoire-2009-1-page-179?lang=fr&tab=texte-integral. Accessed December, 9 2025.
DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. Qu'est-ce que la philosophie? Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1991.
DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Tradução de Brian Massumi. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.
DIGGINS, John P. Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Challenge of Intellectual History. Journal of the History of Ideas, Philadelphia, v. 67, n. 1, p. 181-208, 2006.
GADAMER, Hans Georg. Begriffsgeschichte als Philosophie. In: GADAMER, Hans Georg. Warheit und Methode. Tübingen: Mohr, 1993, v. 2, p. 77-91. Originally published in Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, v.14, p. 137-151, 1970.
GARBER, Daniel. What’s Philosophical about the History of Philosophy. In: SORELL, Tom: ROGERS, Graham Alan John (eds.). Analytical Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005, p. 46-129.
GLOCENIUS, Rudolf. Lexicon philosophicum quo tanquam clave philosophiae fores aperiuntur. Frankfurt: Becker, 1613.
GRAFTON, Anthony. The History of Ideas: Precept and Practice, 1950-2000 and Beyond. Journal of the History of Ideas, Philadelphia, v. 67, n. 1, p.1-32, 2006.
HARRISON, Peter. The Development of the Concept of Law of Nature. In: WATTS, Fraser (ed.). Creation: Law and Probability. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008. p. 13-35.
HENRY, John. Laws of Nature. In: JALOBEANU, Dana; WOLFE Charles T. (general eds.). Encyclopaedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer, 2019, p. 1–13. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_5-1. Accesed Januart, 21 2025.
JAY, Martin. Historical Explanation and the Event: Reflections on the Limits of Contextualization. New Literary History, v. 42, n. 4, p. 557–571, 2011.
KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Tradução de K. Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.
KRÜGER, Lorenz. 1984. Why do we study the history of philosophy? In: RORTY, Richard; SCHNEEWIND, Jerome B.; SKINNER Quentin (eds.). Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, p. 77-101.
LOVEJOY, Arthur. The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1936.
LOVEJOY, Arthur. Reflections on the History of Ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas, Philadelphia, v. 1, n. 1, p. 3-23, 1940.
MICRAELIUS, Johann. Lexicon philosophicum terminorum philosophis usitatorum. Jena: Mamphras, 1653.
O’NEILL, Eileen. Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy. Hypatia, v. 20, no. 3, p.185-197, 2005.
PALTI, Elías. From Ideas to Concepts to Metaphors: The German Tradition of Intellectual History and the Complex Fabric of Language. History and Theory, v. 49, n. 2, p. 194-211, 2010.
RICHTER, Melvin. Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. History and Theory, v. 29, n. q, 1990, p. 38-70.
ROIG, Arturo Andrés. Historia de las ideas, teoría del discurso y pensamiento latinoamericano. Bogotá: Universidad Santo Tomás de Aquino. 1993.
RORTY, Richard. The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres. In: RORTY, Richard; SCHNEEWIND, Jerome B.; SKINNER, Quentin (eds.). Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, p. 49-76.
RORTY, Richard; SCHNEEWIND, Jerome. B.; SKINNER, Quentin (eds.) Introduction. In: RORTY, Richard; SCHNEEWIND, Jerome B.; SKINNER, Quentin (eds.). Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, p. 1-14.
ROUX, Sophie. Les lois de la nature à l’âge classique. La question terminologique. Revue de synthèse, 4 series, n. 2-3-4, p. 531-576, 2001.
SGARBI, Marco. Concepts vs. Ideas vs. Problems: Historiographical Strategies in Writing History of Philosophy. In: POZZO, Ricardo; SGARBI, Marco (eds.). Begriffs-, Ideen- und Problemgeschichte im 21. Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 2011, p. 69-80.
SGARBI, Marco. Umriß der Theorie der Problemgeschichte. In: POZZO, Ricardo; SGARBI, Marco (eds.). Eine Typologie der Formen der Begriffsgeschichte. Meiner: Hamburg, 2010, p. 185-199.
SKINNER, Quentin. Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, v. 8, no. 1, p. 3-53, 1969.
STEINLE, Friedrich. The Amalgamation of a concept. Laws of nature in the new sciences. In: WEINERT, Friedel (ed.). Laws of nature. Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific, and Historical Dimensions. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995, p. 316-368.
TOEWS, John E. Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and the Irreducibility of Experience. The American Historical Review, v. 92, n. 4, 1987, p. 879–907.
VINCENT, Julien. Concepts et contextes de l’histoire intellectuelle britannique: l’«École de Cambridge» à l'épreuve. Revue d’histoire moderne & contemporaine, v. 50, n. 2, 2003, p. 187-207.
VERMEIR, Koen. Philosophy and Genealogy. Ways of Writing the History of Philosophy. In: LÆRKE, Mogens; SMITH, Justin E. H.; SCHLIESSER, Eric (eds.). Philosophy and its history: Aims and methods in the study of early modern philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 50-70.
WAUGH, Joan; ARIEW, Roger. The Contingency of Philosophical Problems. In: LÆRKE, Mogens; SMITH, Justin E. H.; SCHLIESSER, Eric (eds.). Philosophy and its history: Aims and methods in the study of early modern philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 91-114.
WEINERT, Friedel (ed.). Laws of nature. Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1996.
ZARKA, Yves Charles. The Ideology of Context: Uses and Abuses of Context in the Historiography of Philosophy. In: SORELL, Tom; ROGERS, Graham Allan John (eds.). Analytical Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005, p.147-160.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Silvia Manzo

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
O envio de manuscrito para a revista garante aos seus autores a manutenção dos direitos autorais sobre o mesmo e autoriza que a revista realize a primeira publicação do texto. Os dados, conceitos e opiniões apresentados nos trabalhos, bem como a exatidão das referências documentais e bibliográficas, são de inteira responsabilidade dos autores.

Este obra está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.











